problem starting gnome 2.12.2
dbn.lists at gmail.com
Fri Apr 7 10:05:10 PDT 2006
Replying on -dev.
On 4/7/06, Ag Hatzim <zkom.xl at gmail.com> wrote:
> Randy McMurchy(randy at linuxfromscratch.org)@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:09:14AM -0500:
> > So, that said, how many modules are you speaking of Ag?
> Lets see,and if we go with the right order and without to count the
> Mesa/libdrm must be 10,the following.
This seems like a decent idea, but some real thought needs to be put
into the order. For instance, the placement of luit is important.
> I also want to object to pull out the Xorg-7 from the book.
> Is exactly the same code with 6.9.0.
Xorg-7 wouldn't be pulled from the SVN book. Randy is referring to an
as-yet-undecided interim release before LFS goes to udev_update/UTF-8
as stable. In that case, I don't mind if Xorg-7 is dropped from
> What we can do,is to publish an official list with the right
> versions and stick with them,thus will make the support more easily.
Well, there is an official list of tarballs here:
This doesn't include the security fix xorg-server-1.0.2, though.
IMO, it would still be easier for BLFS to point at
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/ for updating
More information about the blfs-dev