slrn S-Lang2 fixes - patch or development snapshot?
Richard A Downing FBCS CITP
richard at langside.org.uk
Wed Apr 5 00:38:29 PDT 2006
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 4/4/06, Randy McMurchy <randy at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 16:58 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>> Assuming the patch works as advertised, how should the change be
>>> implemented? If the patch is deemed too large, we can always use the
>>> development snapshot:
>> I've never heard anyone was worried that a "patch was too large". Heck,
>> if it works, run with it.
> That's good to hear. As far as I can tell, it does work. Unless
> there are no objections, I will commit this tomorrow. Later we can
> have a discussion on whether slrn or Tin or both should be included in
> the book as UTF-8 aware console newsreaders.
My two-pennies. Although I reported it failing to build, and
subsequently built their snapshot, I found that I didn't like the
package, so I can't help validate it for you. Sorry.
I'm afraid my atrophied old brain can't remember keystrokes any more, so
I had to go back to the dead-rodent. :-)
More information about the blfs-dev