Subverson-1.3.0 / BDB
randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Sun Apr 2 21:09:10 PDT 2006
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 21:56 -0600, Archaic wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 10:38:22PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> > DB-4.4.x is in LFS, I don't have any control over that. We *must*
> > assume that it will be installed as package installation instructions
> > are created for BLFS. What good would it do to try something that we
> > cannot use?
> So if apache for some reason just couldn't work with db-4.4.x how would
> LFS's version choice keep BLFS from offering alternate versions?
Dunno, perhaps we need to jointly (with LFS folks) discuss this.
> Regardless, you missed my point in asking the question. It was not to
> see if we could or should revert db, but to see if 4.4 was the trigger.
I don't have DB-4.3 installed anywhere any more. It is however, on
Anduin. Jeremy H installed Subversion 1.3.0 on Anduin, but I don't
know if he runs tests or keeps logs. I will build and run tests on
Anduin and get back to this list on this.
You are right, though, it would be a good test to see if the test
fails on Anduin.
rmlinux: [bogomips 3993.32] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.2]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 22.214.171.124 i686]
23:06:15 up 13 days, 5:40, 5 users, load average: 0.12, 0.06, 0.06
More information about the blfs-dev