Subverson-1.3.0 / BDB

Bruce Dubbs bdubbs at
Sun Apr 2 20:43:20 PDT 2006

Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Archaic wrote these words on 04/02/06 22:28 CST:
>> While FSFS means there is a physical copy of the current revision of a
>> file, BDB is still needed to index the changes, so perhaps this is a
>> stopper afterall? Just out of curiosity, have you tried any db-4.3.x's?
> Didn't see you asked the question about DB-4.3.x. Answer to that
> question is:
> DB-4.4.x is in LFS, I don't have any control over that. We *must*
> assume that it will be installed as package installation instructions
> are created for BLFS. What good would it do to try something that we
> cannot use?

We could say that the package doesn't support the use of current version
of BDB.
  -- Bruce

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list