Linux PAM/Shadow

Randy McMurchy randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Nov 28 15:49:59 PST 2005


Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 11/28/05 17:41 CST:

> I think #2 or #3 are both reasonable as, from your description, they do
> the same thing.

Apparently I am mistaken. Though it worked in testing, removing the
source tree and starting over gets me errors in Shadow's make
complaining that "cannot find library 'lib/libpam.la'". This was
using #2.

I'll just reinstall PAM using those extra switches and manually
move the libs that need to be in /lib.


> Is this something that should be addressed upstream?

I don't believe. I'll do some more testing and get back at you.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
17:46:00 up 65 days, 3:10, 3 users, load average: 0.14, 0.06, 0.17



More information about the blfs-dev mailing list