jhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Nov 25 12:19:07 PST 2005
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I'm hoping that perhaps someone has created such a patch for the new
> Coreutils. If not, what might be best is to create a patch that goes
> *on top* of the existing LFS 'no_uptime_kill_su' patch. This way it
> may be more portable to future versions of Coreutils.
If it goes on top of the existing 'no_uptime...' patch wouldn't that
leave a default LFS install without any installed hostname binary? Or am
I misunderstanding what you're saying?
More information about the blfs-dev