OpenOffice Nitpicks, & Problems
conathan at gmail.com
Fri Nov 18 19:26:54 PST 2005
yeah, forgot one little letter and you'll regret it.
anyway, the patch did not touch the configuration file, so the pam
check still fails. [I can probably rip out the check though].
On 11/18/05, DJ Lucas <dj at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> Nathan Coulson wrote:
> > I was playing around with openoffice, and I noticed the following.
> > Cups is not mentioned as a optional dependency [which I disabled with
> > --disable-cups].
> > It also mentions pam as an optional dependency, but I see no clear way
> > to disable it. [which is where I am currently stuck]. (There is the
> > 1.1.5 patch, which only fails on 1 hunk, but it does not touch the
> > configuration file).
> Nathan, I trust this should have went to BLFS-Dev. :-) CC'd it.
> I had meant to change that in the interim, slipped my mind. There is a
> patch for this, but I've not tested it, so it's not in the book yet.
> Check out http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~dfc04/OOo_2.0.0/ . This is David's
> page (who worked on the firefox changes, which works well but with no TB
> address book data source, which I'll be shooting at shortly). Please
> let me know how it works out.
> I don't know what happened with cups...must have accidently deleted it
> cause it's in the text copy I was using to rewrite the page. Will get
> it put back shortly.
> Thanks for the feedback.
> -- DJ Lucas
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Nathan Coulson (conathan)
nathan at linuxfromscratch org
conathan at gmail com
More information about the blfs-dev