Shared library permissions
bdubbs at swbell.net
Sun Nov 6 21:15:46 PST 2005
Andrew Benton wrote:
>>> On the BIND-9.3.1 server page there is a long instruction to chmod
>>> the installed shared libraries to 755 and the explanation given is
>>> that "Libtool does not set the permissions for these libraries
>>> correctly"...But libtool sets the permissions to 644. How is that not
>>> correct? Why do shared libraries need to be executable? Why go to the
>>> trouble of "fixing" something that isn't broken?
I've make a change to the book to change the explanation of the reason
for the chmod command to:
"Enable the execute bit to prevent a warning when using ldd to check
This is a more accurate explanation and will allow users to make a
judgement whether or not they want to use the chmod instruction.
More information about the blfs-dev