randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Apr 25 19:30:35 PDT 2005
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 04/25/05 21:19 CST:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>Regardless, I suppose I don't understand the need to keep a compiler
>>around in the BLFS book because there are some obscure packages out
>>there that cannot compile with current versions of GCC.
> They are non-free. One cannot compile them at all, they just require
> libstdc++.so.5 at runtime.
To me, even more reason to ditch the old compiler. My understanding
is that this is a Linux From Scratch project. Providing support for
non-free binary packages doesn't fall into the project's goals.
Perhaps, I'm being too short-sighted, but providing support for
non-free binary packages just seems like something we could avoid
and still meet the project's goals.
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 220.127.116.11.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
21:27:00 up 23 days, 21:00, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00
More information about the blfs-dev