openoffice fun

Randy McMurchy randy at
Fri Apr 15 16:14:36 PDT 2005

DJ Lucas wrote these words on 04/15/05 17:02 CST:

> Yes, I believe I should have rephased that question a bit to say 'why
> the rush?' The above answer should stand to answer either, however,
> gcc-3.3 is not required as long as gcc is not 3.4.0 or 3.4.1, though I'd
> like to get 1.5 done when possilbe as well.

Because I cannot determine exactly what you mean, are you saying that
the 1.4.2 version of the JDK will compile okay with GCC-3.4.3 (LFS-6.1
version)? I never even thought to try it.


rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
18:12:00 up 13 days, 17:45, 3 users, load average: 0.23, 0.18, 0.08

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list