bdubbs at swbell.net
Tue Apr 12 22:33:04 PDT 2005
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jeremy Utley wrote these words on 04/12/05 23:23 CST:
> Alphabetical serves no useful purpose, when it contradicts the
> proper build order. At least that's my opinion, anyway.
We can go back to the other order, but I put those sections in alpha
order because of a problem I was having. I am building a new system and
am selecting what packages I want as I go. I'm not building everything
but adding what I need incrementally.
I've built over a hundred packages in the last week. What I found was
that I was continually scanning the TOC for packages. The size of the
TOC and the non-alpha order made it difficult for me to quickly find the
package I wanted. When I did find the package, I went there and
followed the dependency links. I did not want to "build everything in
Please note that I did not update every chapter. The KDE and GNOME
sections are designed to be built in the presented order. I changed
only the Servers section and the Programming chapter.
From a cursory review, it looks like you are complaining about three
doxygen depends on Python
expect depends on tcl and tk
ruby depends on tk
Of these, doxygen and ruby have forward references out of the chapter.
I don't see any packages in the servers section where the order of
packages is significant.
Please sit back and relax. Consider another view. I'll certainly
consider yours. What really is the impact?
More information about the blfs-dev