Some packages I'd like to see added

Billy O'Connor billyoc at
Thu Dec 30 21:16:23 PST 2004

Randy McMurchy <randy at> writes:

> Jeremy Utley wrote:
>> And in my opinion this is wrong.  LFS is a community driven project,
>> and BLFS is an extention of LFS.  *IF* someone is volunteering to do
>> the legwork for the BLFS editors, building the package, checking it
>> all out, checking deps, and so forth, then IMHO, it's extremely
>> short-sighted to not accept that assistance.
> I've had enough. I'm an opinionated person and can't hold it any
> longer.
> Jeremy, you sound like the girl that can't get a date to the
> high school prom, and you're just not going to stop asking all
> the boys until someone asks you out.
> You've made your point. Everyone knows which packages you'd like
> to see in BLFS.
> Enough said, okay?
> Oh, but I'm sure you'll find something I've said to reply to.
> Nobody has responded in a positive manner to your suggestions.
> Doesn't this mean anything to you?
> Doesn't the fact that no less than 4 BLFS editors have disagreed
> with some of your suggestions mean *anything* to you?

Make that 5.

Howdy, gang.  Sorry I was out of touch so long.  Book looks good.  :)


More information about the blfs-dev mailing list