OpenOffice compilation Failures, LFS Unstable

Nathan Coulson conathan at gmail.com
Mon Dec 27 14:32:37 PST 2004


On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 20:43:50 -0600 (CST), blfs-dev at lucasit.com
<blfs-dev at lucasit.com> wrote:
> > blfs-dev at lucasit.com wrote:
> 
> Ugh...I need to fix that in webmail.
> 
> >> I know it's fine
> >> with glibc from 20040701 and gcc-3.3.4.
> >
> > Hopefully, Nathan was using something other than a default LFS-6.0
> > build. If so, let's not worry about it for now. If it was an LFS-6.0
> > build, we need to figure out why your build is different than his. :-)
> >
> 
> Yes, it is definately on the back burner for now.  Way too much to get
> done before BLFS-6.0.  I'll BZ it for future.  Nathan's original post said
> "when testing updates glibc..."  Having said that, anyone that has seen
> this issue, I'd like to know what glibc, gcc and binutils versions you are
> using.  For right now, I still suspect glibc, but who knows?  The expected
> window to find the cause of the breakage is around 4 months...awfull big
> window to work with when rebuilding glibc. :-)  Maybe I can eliminate the
> compiler with an overnight build later this week.  Binutils I'll have to
> see about after current OOo (the desktop-file-utils note is
> wrong..building kde now) and the two courier bugs.
> 
> -- DJ Lucas

BTW, I think I mentioned this was LFS unstable in my origional email

binutils 2.15.94.0.1
gcc 3.3.4 (compiled to /opt)
and glibc 1122
compiling openoffice 1.1.4 [got the same thing compiling 1.1.2]

-- 
Nathan Coulson (conathan)
------
nathan at linuxfromscratch org
conathan at gmail com



More information about the blfs-dev mailing list