GCC-2.95 conflict with LFS

Larry Lawrence larry at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon May 12 17:01:06 PDT 2003

On Mon, 12 May 2003 19:57:12 +0000, Gerard Beekmans wrote:

> On May 12, 2003 10:52 am, Larry Lawrence wrote:
>> I always assume that LFS will be self-contained, so gcc2 will most likely
>> be in both books. I'd suggest matching their directory and verify that we
> Actually the idea was raised by Tushar if gcc-2.95.3 goes into LFS we might 
> take all the stuff from BLFS too like those symlinks and put them into LFS as 
> optional instructions. That way there don't need to be two books that 
> literally expand on eachother, becuase all that would be left in the BLFS 
> book is creating those links. To me that seems a bit silly.
> -- 
> Gerard Beekmans
> http://linuxfromscratch.org
> /* Linux Consultant --- OSDN / DevChannel *
>  * Technical Writer --- CheapBytes        */
> /* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */

It would be great if you could add the symlinks in LFS.  One less thing is
good here.

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list