Ronald Hummelink ronald at
Thu Jun 19 23:52:50 PDT 2003

On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 08:01, Michael A. Peters wrote:

> Gtk2-Perl satisfied the wants of gimp - at least gimp configured and
> compiled no errors. I'm using gimp 1.3.15 so I don't know if using
> Gtk2-Perl would be a good substitute for the blfs Gimp - but using the
> newer Gtk2-Perl would eliminate the issues of the abandoned Gtk-Perl
> module.

Gimp 1.3.x is the port to gtk2. Maybe this is why it is satisfied by the
gtk2-perl ;)?
Gimp 1.3.x is marked unstable/developer version. Maybe it shouldn't be
normative for a package in blfs?

Linux is like a small snowball rolling downhill. Microsoft is just
waiting down the mountain...

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list