Time to go to LFS CVS ??

Billy O'Connor billyoc at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Jan 1 10:42:39 PST 2003

tushar at linuxfromscratch.org (Tushar Teredesai) writes:

> Mark Hymers wrote:
> >reviewing the book and I think it *might* be possible.  The main things
> >we're waiting on at the moment are XFree86-4.3.0 and KDE-3.1; I don't
> >
> Also the docbook sgml packages (for Gnome2), the current hint is kinda
> old and confusing.
> >The only question I have is how would we do BLFS releases between LFS
> >ones: 4.1.0, 4.1.1, 4.1.2?
> >
> No need to make intermediate releases, just make releases
> simaltaneously. Except for the initial simaltaneous announcement
> (which I think should be 5.0), LFS should be the driving force for
> changing version numbers.

Oh, absolutely, that's the beauty of it, you *can't* release between
LFS releases.  And you're *forced* to release at LFS release time.

What the hell, why don't we just call BLFS chapter 10, then we won't
have to worry about all this pesky version numbering and syncronizing.


Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list