gschafer at zip.com.au
Tue Sep 24 02:23:05 PDT 2002
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:19:27PM -0500, Kelledin wrote:
> On Monday 23 September 2002 09:43 pm, dagmar at speakeasy.net wrote:
> > Maybe I'm missing something here, but _why on earth_ are you
> > building version 0.11.0 of gdk-pixbuf? 0.18.0 was the latest
> > (and most useable) version the last time I looked. Granted
> > that was about a month ago, but still...
> Possibly because the Gnome FTP site isn't very clear as to
> whether it's stable or unstable. Last I checked, the latest
> version of gdk-pixbuf (version 0.19.0) was in
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/unstable/sources/, and there were
> no versions in /pub/GNOME/stable. I seem to dimly remember a
> time when that was different, and I seem to remember (equally
> dimly) version 0.11.0 as being the latest "stable" version at
> the time.
I already mentioned this:-
note the PS last para
Some notable Gnome personnel have been known to "flame" LFS so I hereby
take this opportunity to "flame" the Gnome ftp site :-) Tho' looks like
the reorg is heading in the right direction.
0.19.0 is definitely the version to use.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the blfs-dev