Greg Schafer gschafer at
Tue Sep 24 02:23:05 PDT 2002

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:19:27PM -0500, Kelledin wrote:
> On Monday 23 September 2002 09:43 pm, dagmar at wrote:
> > Maybe I'm missing something here, but _why on earth_ are you
> > building version 0.11.0 of gdk-pixbuf?  0.18.0 was the latest
> > (and most useable) version the last time I looked.  Granted
> > that was about a month ago, but still...
> Possibly because the Gnome FTP site isn't very clear as to 
> whether it's stable or unstable.  Last I checked, the latest 
> version of gdk-pixbuf (version 0.19.0) was in 
>, and there were 
> no versions in /pub/GNOME/stable.  I seem to dimly remember a 
> time when that was different, and I seem to remember (equally 
> dimly) version 0.11.0 as being the latest "stable" version at 
> the time.

I already mentioned this:-

note the PS last para

Some notable Gnome personnel have been known to "flame" LFS so I hereby
take this opportunity to "flame" the Gnome ftp site :-)  Tho' looks like
the reorg is heading in the right direction.

0.19.0 is definitely the version to use.

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list