Layout change to *-intro.xml

Larry Lawrence larry at
Sun Oct 13 09:24:12 PDT 2002

Mark Hymers wrote:

> On Sat, 12, Oct, 2002 at 08:39:25PM -0400, Billy O'Connor spoke thus..
>> These both look good to me, Mark.  The one thing that doesn't seem to
>> ring realistic in them is the implication of "Optional Dependencies".
>> I can't quite express it, but somehow the "will utililize"-edness(sic)
>> of the packages in this section doesn't seem clear, if that makes any
>> sense.
> Yeah, I see what you mean.
> Any suggestions as to what to change the headings to?
> Mark

There is actually a standard written on this.  If I remember, it defines 
five levels and gives a base word and equivilents for each. (i.e. 
required=must have=..).  If I could only remember where?

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list