Layout change to *-intro.xml
larry at linuxfromscratch.org
Sun Oct 13 09:24:12 PDT 2002
Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Sat, 12, Oct, 2002 at 08:39:25PM -0400, Billy O'Connor spoke thus..
>> These both look good to me, Mark. The one thing that doesn't seem to
>> ring realistic in them is the implication of "Optional Dependencies".
>> I can't quite express it, but somehow the "will utililize"-edness(sic)
>> of the packages in this section doesn't seem clear, if that makes any
> Yeah, I see what you mean.
> Any suggestions as to what to change the headings to?
There is actually a standard written on this. If I remember, it defines
five levels and gives a base word and equivilents for each. (i.e.
required=must have=..). If I could only remember where?
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the blfs-dev