Wiser ifdown-eth0 script is needed
dj_me at swbell.net
Thu Oct 10 18:45:11 PDT 2002
Larry Lawrence wrote:
> All the questions have to be answered before the recommendation is made to
> LFS. To do otherwise would be making the same error I made the first time.
Oh, I'm not claiming any responsibility to get it changed at the moment.
I think it should stay the way it is untill each maintainer has a
chance to check out the above suggestion and be certain that it does not
cause more than a simple change of a couple of link names. To take
Larry's statment above a step furthur...I would not even consider
recomending a change in lfs-bootscripts until BLFS has reached a 1.0
release, and we have a seperate devel vs stable base to work with.
> (DJ -- my bluntness is not being directed at you or any particular
> individual - your response above is exactly what I expected, I just
> happen to attaching it to your email)
Guess I should have been more 'blunt' in my first statement! ;-)
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the blfs-dev