tchiwam at ees2.oulu.fi
Tue Aug 6 00:47:28 PDT 2002
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:55:59PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> > Putting it in BLFS doesn't make any sense, though. I can just see that
> > chapter now: "Hey guys, did you know that when you were building LFS,
> > there was a better filesystem you could have used? Looks like you can
> > start all over again if you want it! HAHAHAHHAHAH!!!"* :P
> *chuckles* Thanks Feztaa. I needed that. You should spend some more
> time on #LFS. I need to introduce you to a few ppl that have started
> showing up again. *eg*
I keep my own "book" with all the millions of adaptations from the book. I
keep it up to date "once in a while"... by looking at the LFS then I
follow my road.
> You did point out one important thing however.. how should I say this..
> brainless, perhaps?* That people have become when it comes to
> installing and configurating software. Just doing a "click, click"
> and/or copy&pasting.
Saaad panda !
> Keep in mind here, we are pushing for the education value also, remenber?
> Having too many options in the base, will only lead to confusion.
> Like Timothy mentioned, reiserfs was not totally ripped out, there are
> still pointers to other documentation and resources. Mentioning the
> possibilities of using reiserfs (or XFS, ext3, etc), which will all
> eventually make it into the blfs-book. So docs for them and support, is
> not going away; just shifting focus and direction.
> Besides.. we _encourage_ deviations from the book. We just don't think
> we need to *support* and *include* every single possibility in the
/me devious by nature ;-)
----- 8< ---
> Lazy <canadian style>Eh?</canadian style>. Welcome to hell then. I may
> consider myself a lazy bastard...however, that does not mean I need nor
> want my hand held the entire time i'm doing something.
Thats why my book looks like a big bash script ... I work hard to be lazy
----- 8< -------
> So... to all of you people considering using lfs, or are using lfs that
> are a bunch of lazy bastards that aren't even willing to deviate a
> single bit just because you hold this little piece of digital
> information so highly; Quit.
Damn , I lost my lazy title ....
> Go use gentoo. There you have a _distrobution_ which will do all LFS is
> doing (building from scratch/source) while having a very kewl package
> manager that's on par (imho) with the likes of Debian. Ultimate
> lazyness. Push a button and your hole systems get's rebuild, what more
> could you ask for?!?
I am not that lazy ... and gentoo won't cut it for me ...
> For those that are like myself, or those that aren't even lazy. Here,
> here. You know what you have todo. Let's start my master plan and
> move the newbies and people that are stubborn freaks that don't want to
> learn and throw them at gentoo. Means more room for us and others like
> us that like to explore and try new things.
Try new things ? ever tried the kitchen table ? it is great ...
Oups, we talk about LFS here ... -blushes-
> Heck, I bet most of us would still be using Windows if it wasn't so god
> damn unstable (which in recent years, is not so much of an issue)...
Can I be still using Slowlaris instead ?
> So yeah.. anyways. Enough ranting, HIghoS. Stop folling around and get
> back to doing something usefull. *slaps himself* That's the way I see
> it. That's the way id like things.. but as we all know; Life isn't
> like that.
> [*]: People, don't take me too seriously, ok? I *am* joking/ranting here.
Ok now this make sense, BTW did you ever try to "make sense" ? never
worked for me till I added it in a Makefile ...
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the blfs-dev