llawre_ at excite.com
Sun Apr 21 20:54:39 PDT 2002
"DJ Lucas" <dj_me at swbell.net> wrote in message
news:000401c1e9a5$ae901b80$0100a8c0 at name2...
> Okay scripts in cvs look good except two details:
> 1. Putting killproc in script is a bit redundant, plus it
> causes a
> problem with multiple NICs. I think, if I'm not mistaken,
> both dhclient and dhcpcd use the -k option to kill a
> interface, so why don't we eliminate the ifconfig down
> line, and the killproc line and simply use $DHCP_PROG -k
> Later in the shutdown process, sendsignals will force the
> daemon to shut itself down.
No -k on dhclient.
> 2. The way the current scripts are set up, the network script
> called at K80 while sendsignals is at K50..which of course
> an invalid failure (the card has actually been stoped as the
> client is no longer running).
> I had originally suggested moving K80network to K45" but this only
> leaves us
> with 41-44 to work with for killing network dependent software. It
> suggested that we could move all the scripts from K90-K50 downward by
> increments of 5 and then move K80 to K50 which gives us plenty of room
> work with. As far as the killing the program itself, I believe I've
> that dhclient uses the -k option like dhcpcd, unfortunately I'm
> with dhclient and it's configuration and options. I won't be
> later this evening! Just my thoughts.
I've given up on this, to me, the warning message generated when
K90network runs should just be ignored. Modifing LFS is a tricky
business, sometimes it has to be done, but this doesn't seem to be one
of those times.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the blfs-dev