rohde.henning at gmx.net
Wed Oct 24 12:29:23 PDT 2001
Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Mon, 22, Oct, 2001 at 11:55:24PM +0200, Henning Rohde spoke thus..
>> Further work needs to be done on a better layout for the synopsis, the
>> kernel-options and on the link-collection.
OK, I've improved the layout of synopsis and kernel-options, please have a
look at the attachment, it applies incrementially upon my last patch.
The work on the structure of the link-collection is still waiting, but
IMHO that's nothing of any urgency!
>> Known errors:
>> "document type does not allow element "sect3" here"
>> occurs after using an orderedlist in both fw-writing.xml and
>> fw-appendix.xml for structuring the sub-chapters.
> I got it to build by removing the itemized list structure.
Yes, I know, but I want to keep using the <orderedlist>, at any costs
because I'd like to be able to refer to the definitions by (B)!
Is it impossible to include those sub-section into an ordered list, or is
it some bug in the current implementation of docbook?
Both <orderedlist> and <itemizedlist> do not list a inclusion to be a
'DO_NOT', would you do me the please and do further researches on this, I'm
still not that foolish to dare to mail any docbook-developers.
> Shall I put the beta in the book for now so we can get more feedback on
Yes, you may do so, but please apply the attached patch before
> I've also tidied up the XML to the LFS "House-style".. I'm going to write
> document on that soon.. basically, it's that we stick to 80-column lines
> and instead of:
I've chosen to use an incremential patch to reduce the work you would
have needed to tidy-up a totally new patch.
> we do
I'll try to change my habits as soon as I've seen my changes in cvs! ;-)
> This is because openjade is borken and inserts horrible characters if
> you do the first one... (try viewing the LFS FAQ in links and you'll
> see what I mean!).
Sorry, I'm not used to use links, I've tested my works with opera, mozilla
and lynx, and none made me astonish.
> So Henning, do you want me to commit the beta to CVS so that it is in
> the book?
Yeah, let's put in into cvs, I'll be in the look-out for any flames. ;-)
>> PS: I nearly did cut the Synopsis, should I?
> IMO - Yeah - I don't think it's necessary.
OK, please have a look at the new layout, and if you still think it to be
pointless, remove the synopsis on your own.
> Other than that I have to say *great*. It's a really good section.. Now
> I just have to get around to writing something that big... ;-)
Thank you very much, but I really had to do it because of the big noise I
made regarding "Let's start"! ;-)
The BIG work was already done before: the hint that I wrote with much help
from Jeff Bauman.
Hmm, please, do not underestimate your own work, you've written the
structure, the framework, without your work my text would be a hint in XML,
Only because of your work everything is going to make a book, for this we
owe you honour!
Have a nice day,
PS: Would you do me the please and re-consider my idea regarding a new,
I'm thinking about a section or chapter containing advices about "how to
configure the kernel if one needs a certain/given feature" -> I'd prefer to
have fw-kernel.xml put in there than in firewalling.xml.
"Ein Patriot ist einer, der sein Vaterland liebt. Ein Nationalist ist einer,
der die Vaterländer der anderen verachtet" (Johannes Rau)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5934 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the blfs-dev