Hard/Symbolic Links [was: Re: r7347]
theoldfellow at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 08:00:32 PDT 2008
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:50:09 +0200
"Christian Wurst" <christian.wurst at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is an interesting topic and immediately caught my attention when
> I read it.
<snip - read the thread>
and don't forget that while a symlink can bridge filesystems, a
hardlink, being just an inode reference can't.
I don't think I've deliberately used a hardlink in the last decade.
My vote is not to change the author's package unless it's broken. We
have enough to do keeping the book UTD without such niceties.
More information about the blfs-book