[BLFS Trac] #2178: Does teTex require the obsolete unicode package?

BLFS Trac trac at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Jan 18 07:13:49 PST 2007


#2178: Does teTex require the obsolete unicode package?
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  Arnold the Frog  |        Owner:  randy at linuxfromscratch.org
     Type:  task             |       Status:  assigned                  
 Priority:  normal           |    Milestone:  6.2.0                     
Component:  BOOK             |      Version:  SVN                       
 Severity:  normal           |   Resolution:                            
 Keywords:                   |  
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by randy at linuxfromscratch.org):

 I can go either way. Some TeX installations use

 texmf - for files from the original TeX distribution only
 texmf-local - for any files added into the system after the original Tex
 installation
 texmf-local - only for files developed locally.

 Again, I don't care either way. I would, however, like to hear why your
 preference is the way it is. Is it because that's how Debian does it?
 Or because the cm-super fonts are in the texmf structure so the
 type1ec.sty file goes there as well.

 I'm not questioning you Alexander, I'm trying to learn.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2178#comment:8>
BLFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs>
Beyond Linux From Scratch



More information about the blfs-book mailing list