[BLFS Trac] #1777: XFS instructions/LFS dependencies

Andrew Benton b3nt at ukonline.co.uk
Tue Mar 14 08:06:50 PST 2006

BLFS Trac wrote:
> Comment (by randy at linuxfromscratch.org):
>  My opinion (since you asked) is that the book is perfectly fine the
>  way it is. There is a note explaining that if the package was not
>  installed in LFS that you need to install it or another package.
>  I don't see what the bug is all about, nor do I see that it should
>  be a bug. I don't think these packages should be added as dependencies,
>  as they are expected to be installed.
>  The note simply serves as a support-protection device and a courtesy
>  to users who may not have installed the package.
>  I'm for doing absolutely nothing other than closing the bug.



More information about the blfs-book mailing list