[BLFS Trac] #1777: XFS instructions/LFS dependencies
b3nt at ukonline.co.uk
Tue Mar 14 08:06:50 PST 2006
BLFS Trac wrote:
> Comment (by randy at linuxfromscratch.org):
> My opinion (since you asked) is that the book is perfectly fine the
> way it is. There is a note explaining that if the package was not
> installed in LFS that you need to install it or another package.
> I don't see what the bug is all about, nor do I see that it should
> be a bug. I don't think these packages should be added as dependencies,
> as they are expected to be installed.
> The note simply serves as a support-protection device and a courtesy
> to users who may not have installed the package.
> I'm for doing absolutely nothing other than closing the bug.
More information about the blfs-book