cvs commit: BLFS/BOOK/introduction/welcome changelog.xml credits.xml
labuenaestaenlafirma at terra.es
Sun Aug 25 13:26:58 PDT 2002
El Dom 25 Ago 2002 20:35 Mark Hymers escrbió:
> Actually, shouldn't mysql and postgresql share the same startup/shutdown
> numbers in BLFS. I mean, how *likely* is it that people will run both.
> The same should probably apply for postfix,qmail,exim,sendmail.
> Anyone spot a major problem with this approach (it'd keep the symlinks
> appendix easier to read...)
My question is ¿why are only mysql and qmail in the symlinks's list, but no
ther others similar servers?. Same people can feel molest becase her
favorit server isn't in the symlinks's list
If the problem is keep the appendix clean and easier to read, maybe a
comment in symlinks.xml about this issue can be enough.
It's only my opinion and, of course, can be wrong
Manuel Canales Esparcia macana at macana-es.com
Usuario de LFS nº 2886 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es
Lísta de correo: http://listas.escomposlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-es
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-book' in the subject header of the message
More information about the blfs-book