Lots of Bugzilla Traffic / QA Stuff

Mark Hymers markh at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Sep 19 00:51:05 PDT 2001


On Tue, 18, Sep, 2001 at 11:07:41PM -0700, jbauman at adsl-63-193-249-142.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:15:09PM -0400, Seth W. Klein wrote:
> > > <snip> Also, I would suggest that we change the state
> > > to VERIFIED rather than CLOSED, and only close bugs once we do something
> > > like an official release. <snip>
> > 
> > I thought VERIFIED was for "verified that this i really a bug, not
> > a duplicate or luser not following instructions or...." Or am i
> > totally clueless?
>  
> Seth, 
> I can tell you that QA departments at software companies (as I very
> recently worked in one) use this designation as "fix of this bug is 
> verified as fixed."
> 
I actually thought the way Seth did at first until I realised that
CONFIRMED is for that.  I now realise that RESOLVED | VERIFIED is
probably for use in the way we are using it.

/me is not the biggest bugzilla fan in the world

Mark

-- 
Mark Hymers					 BLFS Project Leader
markh at linuxfromscratch.org
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-book' in the subject header of the message



More information about the blfs-book mailing list