LFS Mailing Lists Change
gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Sep 6 16:29:23 PDT 2001
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 07:18:07PM -0400, Seth W. Klein wrote:
> (b)lfs-discuss: I think the name lfs-dev (or lfs-develope) gives
> a more "getting serious work done, not a place for frivolous
> posts" type impression which is what (i think) we want because
> high traffic and noise might turn away serious types of people.
> I know, that does mean renaming lfs-discuss, but i actually
> think that is good because it emphasizes that support and KDE
> posts don't belong there anymore.
It is an idea worth keeping in mind. Renaming lfs-discuss isn't so hard,
since lfs-discuss@ can become an alias to lfs-dev, it's just that people
will have to make one small change to their mail filters and add
lfs-dev, if this is what we end up doing.
> (b)lfs-book: A couple things:
> One, this name doesn't make it immediatly clear what the list
> is for. If it's for bugzilla (and maybe cvs commit) notices,
> lfs-status seems a clearer name.
> Two, if we're not sure we'll use these lists wouldn't it
> be better to wait and add them if we experience the need?
We're already using those lists (lfs-book and blfs-book) for quit some
time now (since March 11th or so). The name is fine, they're not really
public lists (although anybody can subscribe to it, etc).
-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
More information about the blfs-book