Adding to "Cleaning Up'

Pierre Labastie pierre.labastie at
Fri Jan 10 23:55:11 PST 2014

Le 11/01/2014 04:18, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> Le 10/01/2014 00:08, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>>> Pierre,
>>>     In LFS, I want to add an instruction to chapter06/revisedchroot.xml
>>> which is actually titled "Cleaning Up".  When I tested jhalfs,
>>> 129-revisedchroot is not run in the Makefile, but
>>> lfs-commands/chapter06/129-revisedchroot is created.
>>> The revised 'chroot' command should not be run but the new 'rm' command
>>> should be.  I'd like to see a role="noauto" (or equivalent) for
>>> <userinput> to skip the chroot command, but also run 129-revisedchroot
>>> in the Makefile.
>>> Would that be hard to do?
>>>     -- Bruce
>> I think I could try to do that during the week-end. The easy part is to run
>> the script in the Makefile. The harder part is to split the script, because
>> the chroot instruction is needed too (variable CHROOT2 in the Makefile), but
>> of course should not be run when the script is run. So I think I'll split the
>> script into 129-1-revisedchroot and 129-2-revisedchroot, use the -1 for
>> extracting the chroot command and run the -2 in the Makefile. For
>> discriminating the two strings, I do not think a special role="" attribute is
>> needed, but I need to be sure that the new command to be run does not contain
>> "chroot". Is that the case?
> Yes, that's the case, but it may be useful to have a general way to add 
> an instruction but not have jhalfs include it.  That's what I had in 
> mind with the role attribute.  Another thought is something like 
> role='comment' and have the instruction(s) in that code chunk preceded 
> with a #.
>    -- Bruce
Why not use "role='nodump'"? It is enough for jhalfs.


More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list