RFC: Continue CLFS support?
tom.pegg at gmail.com
Fri Jan 4 09:36:32 PST 2013
On 1/2/2013 4:21 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 01/01/2013 01:02, Thomas Pegg a écrit :
>> Wanted to open this up to the list for comments.
>> If you didn't know jhalfs has supported for a long time LFS, CLFS
>> and use to support HLFS, but support for that was discontinued
>> sometime ago. What I've noticed as of late is that most changes
>> to jhalfs, concern LFS. Now this is not a bad thing, but it does
>> make me think that the primary users are those from the LFS/BLFS
>> crowd. I haven't seen too much traffic from CLFS users.
>> Therefore the question is do we continue to maintain support for
>> a book that is hardly used or not??
> Actually we just partly support clfs, since it is now on git, and
> the instructions for downloading are still using subversion. I have
> not tested whether it still works with a local copy of the clfs
> book. Maybe your message should be sent to the clfs list(s)?
Ah, good point. Forgot about them being on git. Will post a message to
the CLFS list later.
More information about the alfs-discuss