jhalfs not deal with the Chapter 9 of lfs

Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Sat May 12 14:35:03 PDT 2012

Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 12/05/2012 22:57, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
>> Le 12/05/2012 22:11, xinglp a écrit :
>>> and the ownership of /etc/lfs-release is not root
>> Thanks for pointing that. I think it is corrected now.
>> For the remaining of chapter 9, I wouldn't think
>> that it has to be included in jhalfs, since it is
>> mainly "get counted", which is something you do at
>> most once in your life.
>> Pierre
> Sorry, I had an old version of the book. I see that
> /etc/lsb-release is different now. I'll put that in jhalfs,
> but still hardcoded I think. Has anybody something
> to say against DISTRIB-CODENAME being
> "<username>-jhalfs"?

I think that's a good codename.

   -- Bruce

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list