Welcoming HLFS back into the fold

M.Canales.es macana at macana-es.com
Wed Mar 28 12:13:02 PDT 2007


El Miércoles, 28 de Marzo de 2007 20:58, Dan Nicholson escribió:

> Ideally, this would go back to Robert and into HLFS, or something else
> that makes the commands be successful. IMO, it's bad form to have
> commands that are known to fail. Even if you're not scripting, a wise
> person will ensure that commands are returning successfully.

The book explanations says that it must fail and show the output errors 
generated.

Thats wy the book add "echo $?" after the command run, to be sure that the 
return status is not "0".

In jhalfs we could live with a "0" in the logs while the actual errors are 
still logged.

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org



More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list