Glibc build failure with /bin/sh -> /bin/dash

M.Canales.es macana at macana-es.com
Wed Feb 14 15:29:02 PST 2007


El Jueves, 15 de Febrero de 2007 00:10, Matthew Burgess escribió:

> As you know, currently jhalfs applies a workaround of
> passing "SHELL=/bin/bash" to `make' so that progressbar.sh and the unpack
> commands, which contain bashisms, work properly.  The problem I have with
> this is that by doing this, the environment is different to that which is
> explicitly defined in the LFS book, hence jhalfs diverges from the commands
> in LFS and therefore can't be trusted as a mechanism to test the book out
> with.  If it hadn't have been setting SHELL, I'd have seen the whole glibc
> vs. dash problem first-hand and could have gotten the book fixed up sooner.

The thread that driver us to add SHELL=/bin/bash start here:

http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/alfs-discuss/2006-November/009008.html

I need to re-read it also and now is very late for me to do it. Lets start the 
discussion to find the best solution for that.


-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org



More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list