jhablfs Makefile dependencies
chris at beaker67.com
Wed Feb 1 07:59:40 PST 2006
Ivor Hewitt wrote:
> Just started playing with jhablfs (done two successful jhalfs builds so
> far... magic! Many thanks)
> and I was curious, at the moment the generated makefile doesn't seem
> able to cope with 'alternative' dependencies (apart from a few other
> niggles I'll submit patches for later).
> For example:
> imagemagick: xfree86 xorg
> Isn't an ideal situation. Are alternative package choices defined in the
> source xml or do these need hand defining somewhere?
> Would the ideal solution be that automatic dependencies don't get
> fulfilled where there exist alternatives (perhaps a hyrbrid target
> "xfree86-xorg" that produces an error when invoked) but building either
> of the xorg or xfree86 targets would then satisfy this dependency and
> create a hybrid xfree86-xorg file.
> Are there any other 'alternative' dependencies in the blfs book other
> than the obvious xorg/xfree?
Several packages can use Berkeley DB/GDBM, or "an MTA (Postfix or Exim
More information about the alfs-discuss