georgeb at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Apr 8 10:50:52 PDT 2006
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:33:59PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
>> El Sábado, 8 de Abril de 2006 19:14, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
>>> However, we're now merging this code back into trunk, so I'm wondering
>>> if it might be less confusing to just continue to refer to it as jhalfs.
>>> We called it extended because it reached much further than the original
>>> jhalfs did, but in many ways the new features were just the natural
>>> progression and next step...
>> Well, I'm agnostic about what name is used to refer to it.
> Like I said, it is a minor point. I just feel that there isn't really a
> need to distinguish it from the original code, especially as we've
> merged it to trunk, and that the -X just adds an extra layer of
> ambiguity and/or confusion.
> I'll wait to hear what George (or anyone else that wishes to comment)
> has to say first.
I have no preference either way, the -X was to separate it from the
mainstream scripts during mailings.
More information about the alfs-discuss