SUMMARY: alfs direction manuel at
Fri Nov 25 13:02:15 PST 2005

El Viernes, 25 de Noviembre de 2005 21:59, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:

> Yes, that's good. :) Except that it would almost be better done as
> individual files, like:
> 028-gcc-pass1.configure
> 028-gcc-pass1.make
> 028-gcc-pass1.install
> So that they could be called and sent individually.

If the client send "execute glibc-pass1 install" no matter if that  "unpack" 
or "install" functions are defined on separate files or not.

Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:
LFS en castellano:

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list