lord_alan at dsl.pipex.com
Wed Nov 23 03:14:39 PST 2005
David Lyne wrote:
> Hello Alan
> > Editing the nALFS profiles is a bit (very) tedious and is also error
>> prone... Although it does enable you to customise your build exactly
>> the way you want it including adding BLFS bits and other stuff just
>> for you.
> I was hoping (in time) to add some BLFS stuff. However on the basis of
> all the replies, for now I shall download nALFS and study the profiles
> and see if I can understand what's going on.
If you look around, there is normally a profile for BLFS. You need to
edit this for your own purposes but it makes a good starting point.
>> However, from the discussions recently on this list, I would guess
>> that nALFS doesn't have a long term future and that the script based
>> system or a new client/server based system will take its place in time...
> I assume that this statement would apply to hjalfs as well?
jhalfs is still under development so I would think that this will be
around for a while... Jeremy?
> Thanks for your help everyone.
More information about the alfs-discuss