[RFC] BLFS Profile: Dependencies not included in the BLFS Book

Joachim Beckers jbeckers at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Mar 8 11:14:29 PST 2005


Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Joachim Beckers wrote:
> 
>> a more elegant and compact solution would be this:
>> {packageinfo}
>>   {requires}
>>     {name}{/name}
>>     {name}{/name}
>>     {name}{/name}
>>     {name}{/name}
>>   {/requires}
>>   {utilizes}
>>     {name}{/name}
>>     {name}{/name}
>>     {name}{/name}
>>   {/utilizes}
>> {/packageinfo}
> 
> 
> The requires and utilizes elements also support 'version' attributes, 
> IIRC. That would make this harder to do.

Correct. I hadn't thought about that, but now I see that there's no way 
to overcome this problem (unless allowing 'version' attributes within 
{name} tags, but that sounds illogical).

joachim



More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list