nALFS bug?: build fails because of optional package
jamie at linuxuk.org
Mon Mar 7 13:22:33 PST 2005
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 12:38 -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Thomas Pegg wrote:
> > Is there anyway we can get it to list which ones are missing like it
> > does for the utilized packages???? I've done some digging in the nALFS
> > source code but not sure of the right way to go about it, if it's
> > possible at all.
> Yes, it's certainly possible. The same code that prints the warnings for
> "utilized" packages could print errors for "required" packages.
Committed a fix to SVN.
BTW I'm thinking of rolling a 1.2.5 to address this and the
--disable-digest feature. Anyone have any impending things that they
would _really_ like to see in 1.2.5?
More information about the alfs-discuss