[RFC] BLFS Profile: Dependencies not included in the BLFS Book

Kevin P. Fleming kpfleming at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Mar 5 14:29:52 PST 2005


Joachim Beckers wrote:

> a more elegant and compact solution would be this:
> {packageinfo}
>   {requires}
>     {name}{/name}
>     {name}{/name}
>     {name}{/name}
>     {name}{/name}
>   {/requires}
>   {utilizes}
>     {name}{/name}
>     {name}{/name}
>     {name}{/name}
>   {/utilizes}
> {/packageinfo}

The requires and utilizes elements also support 'version' attributes, 
IIRC. That would make this harder to do.



More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list