[Suggestion] change in wget-scripts

Torsten Vollmann Torsten at Vollmann-Online.de
Mon Jan 3 09:07:45 PST 2005

HNY eyeryone.

Any comments to the following?

Torsten Vollmann schrieb:

> Hi all.
> Right now the wget scripts in the profiles use the -nc option as 
> suggested some months ago by Richard A Downing. The intention is not to 
> download an already existing file a second time.
> The problem with the -nc option is that it only checks for the existence 
> of the given file. Now there could be the case that the download is 
> interrupted resulting in a partially downloaded file. When the wget 
> script is reinvoked this file wouldn't be completed!
> So I suggest a change from the '-nc' option to the '-N -r -nd' options:
> The -N option compares the creation-time and size of the files and 
> starts the download if they differ.
> The -r option results in the already existing file to be overwritten 
> instead of a .1 file beeing created.
> In my tests of the -N -r options wget somehow gets to creating the 
> directory-structure of the hosting server so the -nd option must also be 
> given to prevent it from doing that.
> The benefit of these options is the assurance that the files are 
> completely downloaded, the downside is that for every file in the list 
> wget has to obtain the size and date of the hosted file. This could 
> count in if one has limits in bandwith etc.
> Cheers,
> Torsten.

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list