jamie at linuxuk.org
Mon Feb 21 11:50:24 PST 2005
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 21:18 +0000, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>So, does anyone have any information contrary to what I've stated above
>(i.e. there is a validating XML processor which supports XIncludes, DOM
>and SAX provided by the stock Python tarball)? Or does anyone mind if
>we retain libxml2 as a dependency for alfs?
I'm fine with keeping libxml2. It gives us alot more functionality which
we could really use.
More information about the alfs-discuss