[RFC] SRS Section 3

Jeremy Huntwork jhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Feb 7 19:06:10 PST 2005


Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> 
>> And some of the stuff that is mentioned in the links is, IMHO, 
>> sufficiently described in the main SRS.
> 
> 
> And IMHO such descriptions don't belong in the main SRS - they're not 
> describing *requirements*, they're describing design/implementation 
> details.  Jamie/James can probably best answer this one, but is it 
> common to have links from the requirements spec to the design docs, or 
> is it usually just links back from the design to the requirements?
> 
> Remember Jeremy (and others of course) - someone should be able to take 
> the requirements spec and see exactly *what* alfs will do, without 
> getting bogged down in any low-level details.

Err. Yes. :) That's actually what I was trying to say. But perhps I just 
needed to phrase it differently. Enough of the specs have been already 
listed in the SRS without going into unecessary details.

--
Jeremy H.



More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list