[RFC] SRS Section 3
jhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Feb 7 19:06:10 PST 2005
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> And some of the stuff that is mentioned in the links is, IMHO,
>> sufficiently described in the main SRS.
> And IMHO such descriptions don't belong in the main SRS - they're not
> describing *requirements*, they're describing design/implementation
> details. Jamie/James can probably best answer this one, but is it
> common to have links from the requirements spec to the design docs, or
> is it usually just links back from the design to the requirements?
> Remember Jeremy (and others of course) - someone should be able to take
> the requirements spec and see exactly *what* alfs will do, without
> getting bogged down in any low-level details.
Err. Yes. :) That's actually what I was trying to say. But perhps I just
needed to phrase it differently. Enough of the specs have been already
listed in the SRS without going into unecessary details.
More information about the alfs-discuss