zhouhui at wam.umd.edu
Sat Feb 5 14:32:29 PST 2005
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 03:28:01PM -0600, James Robertson wrote:
>Hui Zhou wrote:
>OK, now you are getting on my nerves
Hope I can get off. :)
>and I have tough ones.
I like tough ones. :)
>have not ready anything we have written down.
You mean read? How I replied then?
>It clearly states in the
>SRS that we expect full backwards compatibility to nALFS 1.2x profiles
>written on the 3.1 ALFS DTD. >We *are* *not* *going* *to* *write* *a*
>*different* *profile* *language* *period*. I can not make this any more
I thought the SRS is in RFC mode.
And I thought every one are aware that since KF left, the team -- Neocool
and Jamie were working on new, simpler profiles. Neocool's moongoo
support 4 syntaxes: nALFS, lfsbook, syn, and ass. Don't ask me what
on earth gave those names, but the latter two were in my school of
>clear. I could care less about how much you think it is a pain in the
>neck to write a alfs profile using the existing syntax.
>I am no where a
>programmer and I have no trouble creating some pretty custom wacky
>profiles to do what I want them to do. What is the big deal anyways?
>No one else repsond to this. This conversation is closed.
I implied the same in my previous post. :-)
More information about the alfs-discuss