zhouhui at wam.umd.edu
Sat Feb 5 11:42:27 PST 2005
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 07:03:02PM +0000, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>Hui Zhou wrote:
>>My point: Scooter and Hummer, and 5 minutes down the park.
>OK, whilst you're busy re-writing a validating XML parser
I wrote a few for my own projects. And I know I am not alone.
You agree what I said what a validation of XML mean, right. Yes, all
my project will spit on *invalid* XML document of its own type.
>(it has to be
>validating due to the functional requirements in the SRS), we'll be busy
>working on alfs itself. Note that if you're writing an XML parser it
>has to conform to the standard which you're going to have to read,
Did you read the article I cited in lfs-chat. The standard is way too
cumbersom and the comittee is seriously interested in publish a *core*
version of XML.
There is no sharing in alfs. "we" write functions for our own use, as
long as it works and clean, why would "we" care for the standard?
More information about the alfs-discuss