[RFC] SRS Section 2
zhouhui at wam.umd.edu
Wed Feb 2 10:39:13 PST 2005
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:44:46PM -0500, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>Ok, so are we any further with this section? Here's the issues as I see
>1. Are we using nALFS's DTD are are we creating a new one?
>2. I definitely think there should be *some* type of validation before
>the server even tries to parse the XML. As far as I'm concerned, there
>really is no question about that (or about our utilizing XML for
>profiles). So, should that be done with RELAX-NG? It seems the LFS Book
>is headed in that direction, so it may make sense to follow that trend.
>Personally, though, I don't know enough about RELAX-NG to make that call.
Yeah, only valid reason stated here is the "trend". No question that
XML has been, is, and will be the "trend". :)
You are the leader, you make the decision as long as you know your
More information about the alfs-discuss