[RFC] SRS Section 2
jamie at linuxuk.org
Wed Feb 2 09:51:54 PST 2005
Quoting Jeremy Huntwork <jhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org>:
> 1. Are we using nALFS's DTD are are we creating a new one?
The SRS states that alfs with be a direct replacement for nALFS so the same tags
need to be present even if we extend the DTD.
> 2. I definitely think there should be *some* type of validation before
> the server even tries to parse the XML.
We should use Relax-NG as it more strict with the validating.
> Jeremy H.
More information about the alfs-discuss