Programming language

Hui Zhou zhouhui at
Tue Feb 1 11:31:41 PST 2005

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:25:27AM -0700, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 08:30, James Robertson wrote:
>> new tool is programmed in.  I just want it to work.  Here are my
>> thoughts on the matter to start discussion.
>I would choose plain old C for the server too. It doesn't do anything
>fancy: listen on a port for a TCP connection, authenticate, validate,
>run whatever it's given without question.

For maintain the connection and fork server, I can code it in C or 
perl or python within minutes. 

Authentication is tough. I suggest trust based authentication. Define 
a key or ip(or many) on the server and instruct the server only 
listens to those. That's easy. Others takes a professional to 
implement and make sure it's secure. 

Validataion, I assume we are talking about command parsing. The 
easiest protocol is ascii based and with a regex engine, it is very 
easy to implement. Binary protocol can be more efficient of course, 
but the development cycles esclates.

>But we want the server process to be fast and responsive. Not every
>system will be a 3 GHz system out there. 

You probably won't find it much slower if a human is sitting on the 
server :) instead of a program.

Do you realize that only thing the server does is parse the command 
and run other programs.

>Python and Perl speeds might be
>circumspect on the slower machines. Then again..if it takes a minute to
>start a server process...compared to a build that would take 20 hours,
>would anybody care?

It takes miliseconds to start a server process. Hundreds of processes 
is another problem.

Hui Zhou

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list