Top things to see in first ALFS
zhouhui at wam.umd.edu
Tue Feb 1 11:15:46 PST 2005
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:20:19AM -0700, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 10:24, Hui Zhou wrote:
>> I will propose one model: the server run standalone, which mean it
>> works by "alfs profile run" and it will run from start to end without
>> problem if the profile is proofed.
>I personally was more thinking along the lines of a system has an "alfs"
>process running in the background that isn't doing anything.
No problem. Run "alfs profile wait" :), it is an easy option to
>> If alfs is developed without specific concious of package manager, I
>> quite suspect that some stage, one would call for program from scratch
>That might not be an issue. If there is proper installation logging we
>have all we need. A package manager can be built around those logs. And
>if more info is required, the logging component of alfs can be extended
>to provide additional information (such as the dependencies involved
>when building a package).
The reason I raise the question is because they talked about xml log,
which sounds like building a package manager database during the run.
If that is the case, IMHO, better plan well and do well. Otherwise,
why not just dump the log as it goes; as you said and I agree, all the
stuff are there, one just need a log parser to analyse the logs and
turn it into database, which can be done at the same time of building
or at any later time.
More information about the alfs-discuss