[zhouhui at wam.umd.edu: Re: a few decisions]
zhouhui at wam.umd.edu
Tue Feb 1 09:33:20 PST 2005
Sorry for lfs-dev :)
----- Forwarded message from Hui Zhou <zhouhui at wam.umd.edu> -----
From: Hui Zhou <zhouhui at wam.umd.edu>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:33:15 -0500
To: lfs-dev at linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: a few decisions
Quoting jamie bennett:
>I hate to throw a spanner in the works but for me, parsing the XML
>from the book would be my highest priority. Profile maintainance
>isn't only a chore it's prone to human error. If we could parse
>the whole of the lfs and blfs books into seperate, self-contained
>profiles, I think we could have a pretty powerful system from the
>get-go. Having each profile self-contained would make selecting
>only the ones you wanted alot easier.
IMO, there is nothing wrong that each coder/contributer/user have
their own and different priority. There is nothing prohibiting Jamie keep
drilling on the book as profile.
That said, IMHO, the book has a complete different objective than
alfs. In short, it is not targeted toward automation. It is totally
possible to use it as profile but one must pay its price such as bloat
the program by large percent to accomodate all kinds of oddities in
the book. If the book (G) agrees that make automation one of lfs
book's objective, in that case, I don't have objections, other than
being sad to see the book change its sail.
And again, IMHO, parsing profile is just a very small part of alfs and
that can and should be implemented as plugin. So working on the book
as profile have a good chance to be used as long as it does not put a
heavy footprint on the alfs's other functionalities.
Last, as a suggestion, if one can automatically extract the commands
out of the book, and one can automatically convert the commands into a
profile (what ever format it would be), that still achieves near zero
maintainence. And as a huge bonus I see, it won't drag alfs down even
the book changes and the book parsing fails.
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
----- End forwarded message -----
More information about the alfs-discuss